Unevidenced, and poorly reasoned assertion. In some sort of “true” patriarchy, Wall-E would be the abnormality, as he is less gendered than the more “normally” gendered EVE.
It would seem that in a patriarchy, to be less gendered or classifiable is to be abnormal. See: “gay-bashing”

Your assertion doesn’t square with this.

Also, thanks for being the ass-hole, Neville, by employing personal attack rather than evidence and reasoned logic. Great way to represent men.

WALL*E is a movie that conveys a environmental message that all should like. Instead, you’ve decided to act like the typical antitechnological asshole that exists on the ‘Net and everywhere else. Plus, you still have to bring in critiques about the gender of the characters, like a lemming going off of a cliff, or a religious leader stuck in a miasma of dogma.

It seem to me that you think that you can do better than Disney. So why don’t you get off of your ass and make it happen, then? Why not try to write a script that you think is better than this movie? (And please don’t give me that bullshit about how The Man doesn’t let voices like yours in-that excuse is too old for words.)