<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Feminist Review</title>
	<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com</link>
	<description>Calling Patriarchy As We See It</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Scheherazade Goes West</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/scheherazade-goes-west.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/scheherazade-goes-west.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[arab]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[body image]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fatema mernissi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[harem]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[islam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[islamic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[morocco]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Wolfe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scarf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[western]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/scheherazade-goes-west.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	-->
Fatema Mernissi follows the harem into Western literature, art and psyche, sharing fascinating insights on misogyny in Middle Eastern and Western culture along the way.
	During her book tour for Dreams of Trespass: Tales of a Harem Girlhood, she was surprised by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--></style>
<p>Fatema Mernissi follows the harem into Western literature, art and psyche, sharing fascinating insights on misogyny in Middle Eastern and Western culture along the way.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">	During her book tour for <em>Dreams of Trespass: Tales of a Harem Girlhood</em>, she was surprised by Western male journalists&#8217; gleeful attitudes toward harems and decided to investigate. She found that these Western men, aided by Matisse, Kant and Ingres, understood women in harems to be silent, obedient and always sexually desirous. But Arab men have feared the women in their harems who might revolt at any time.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/scheherazade-goes-west.html#more-34" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/scheherazade-goes-west.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wicked</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/wicked.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/wicked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dorothy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elphaba]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[evil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[glinda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[good witch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gregory maguire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nessarose]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriarchy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teen novels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teenagers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wicked]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[witch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wizard of oz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[young adult fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/wicked.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--> 	
	Does Wicked promote feminism? I would love to ask author Gregory Maguire that very question!
In this society, women have fewer vocational and public opportunities than men, and seem to be bound by family obligations more than men are. That sounds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--> 	</style>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">	Does <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=MLEujRNyoMUC&amp;dq=wicked&amp;pg=PP1&amp;ots=h2R_FO5oNe&amp;sig=4X1_Fwy9twOHBtg7XmZvkxqw1a4&amp;hl=en&amp;prev=http://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dwicked%26ie%3Dutf-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26rls%3Dcom.ubuntu:en-US:official%26client%3Dfirefox-a&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=print&amp;ct=title&amp;cad=one-book-with-thumbnail#PPA189,M1" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/books.jpeg" alt="books.jpeg" align="right" hspace="10" /></a><span style="font-style: normal"><em><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=MLEujRNyoMUC&amp;dq=wicked&amp;pg=PP1&amp;ots=h2R_FO5oNe&amp;sig=4X1_Fwy9twOHBtg7XmZvkxqw1a4&amp;hl=en&amp;prev=http://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dwicked%26ie%3Dutf-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26rls%3Dcom.ubuntu:en-US:official%26client%3Dfirefox-a&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=print&amp;ct=title&amp;cad=one-book-with-thumbnail#PPA189,M1" target="_blank">Wicked</a></em> promote feminism? I would love to ask author Gregory Maguire that very question!</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-style: normal">In this society, women have fewer vocational and public opportunities than men, and seem to be bound by family obligations more than men are. That sounds familiar&#8230;so what does the novel say about this inequality?</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-style: normal">	The main character Elphaba is a very strong and non-traditional women - I think it&#8217;s safe to call her a feminist, and she is hated and even filled for it. Many of the powerful in the story are women, but all are still constantly judged by their looks, charm, kindness, and other traditionally feminine traits.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-style: normal">	The Wizard is a really nasty person, for example, but is not criticized for this – it is simply accepted, as is the entire population&#8217;s deep fear of him. But Elphaba&#8217;s harsh personality is of primary concern throughout the book.</span> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/wicked.html#more-32" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/06/wicked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>lolcats</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/05/lolcats.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/05/lolcats.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lolcats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriarcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/05/lolcats.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Thanks to Melissa for this fabulous lolcat!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/postcatriarchy.jpg" alt="postcatriarchy.jpg" /></p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.waterblossoms.net" target="_blank">Melissa</a> for this fabulous lolcat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/05/lolcats.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eat Pray Love</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/eat-pray-love.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/eat-pray-love.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bridget jones' diary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eat pray love]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elizabeth gilbert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[empowering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fairy tale]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[masturbation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriarchy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[servant leadership]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[single women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/eat-pray-love.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think a memoir can be patriarchal. I believe that the act of telling one&#8217;s own story is inherently empowering, A person can be a complete racist, misogynist jerk and lie all throughout a memoir, and the book could be used to promote and support patriarchy. But when written with integrity, a memoir is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think a memoir can be patriarchal. I believe that the act of telling one&#8217;s own story is inherently empowering, A person can be a complete racist, misogynist jerk and lie all throughout a memoir, and the book could be used to promote and support patriarchy. But when written with integrity, a memoir is a gift to oneself and one&#8217;s readers, and can be a powerful piece of the journey out of patriarchal living and thinking.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Gilbert&#8217;s <a href="http://www.elizabethgilbert.com" target="_blank">Eat Pray Love</a> is disarming and insightful. Her vulnerability is engaging, and was affirming to me, as a reader. This dynamic is part of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servant_leadership" target="_blank">servant leadership</a>, and also a traditionally &#8220;feminine&#8221; trait. How do we encourage <em>all</em> people to begin with vulnerability?</p>
<p>Anyone who is able to share honestly (not just 7th grade humor) about masturbation is dismantling patriarchy. Women, especially, have been taught that masturbation is unhealthy and dirty, and I&#8217;m really impressed that Gilbert included a few (very relevant) paragraphs on her own experience. Her down-to-earth approach is a wonderful way to normalize masturbation for women.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/eat-pray-love.html#more-28" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/eat-pray-love.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prostituting for Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/prostituting-for-charity.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/prostituting-for-charity.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[empowering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist pornography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[julie bindel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lauren cameron]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mel b]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[naked women]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[objectification of women]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PETA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex object]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stipping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strip clubs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transexual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/prostituting-for-charity.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pregnant woman in underpants on all fours in a cage on the sidewalk.
A woman wrapped in cling film to resemble cuts of meat in a supermarket.
Mel B gets her &#8220;tits out for trafficking.&#8221;
Most of us have come to expect the exploitation of women&#8217;s bodies to sell everything from cars to cleaning products - but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pregnant woman in underpants on all fours in a cage on the sidewalk.</p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A woman wrapped in cling film to resemble cuts of meat in a supermarket.</font></font></p>
<p>Mel B <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">gets her &#8220;tits out for trafficking.&#8221;</font></font></p>
<p>Most of us have come to expect the exploitation of women&#8217;s bodies to sell everything from cars to cleaning products - but for charity?</p>
<p>Julie Bindel takes PETA and other charities on in <a href="http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/040808WA.shtml" target="_blank">Prostituting for Charity</a>, published on truthout.org.</p>
<p>As a young and idealistic vegan, I was shocked when Pamela Anderson posed naked for PETA. But I was too embarrassed to complain. I figured I would sound prudish, square, or worst - jealous of her &#8220;sexy&#8221; body and ashamed of my own.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/prostituting-for-charity.html#more-27" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/prostituting-for-charity.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packaging Girlhood, and How Far We Still Have To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/packaging-girlhood-and-how-far-we-still-have-to-go.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/packaging-girlhood-and-how-far-we-still-have-to-go.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hardie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[community events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girlhood]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girls inc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lyn_mikel_brown]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[richmond]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexual objectification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[young women]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/packaging-girlhood-and-how-far-we-still-have-to-go.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week, author/speaker/researcher Lyn Mikel Brown came to town to  speak about the themes in her book, Packaging Girlhood.  In the book,  Brown asserts that girlhood is being commercialized and shaped in ways  that are unhealthy and damaging to our children, primarily through false  notions of empowerment, profit-driven manipulation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past week, author/speaker/researcher Lyn Mikel Brown came to town to  speak about the themes in her book, <a href="http://www.packaginggirlhood.com/">Packaging Girlhood</a>.  In the book,  Brown asserts that girlhood is being commercialized and shaped in ways  that are unhealthy and damaging to our children, primarily through false  notions of empowerment, profit-driven manipulation of the transition  from childhood to adolescence, and increased sexualization and  fetishization of girls.</p>
<p>This post is not about the content of Brown&#8217;s talk, though it was quite  good.  Instead, it&#8217;s about at least one reaction to the announcement of  the event, and what it might tell us about how much work is yet to be  done in finding equity and justice for women in our culture.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/packaging-girlhood-and-how-far-we-still-have-to-go.html#more-26" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/packaging-girlhood-and-how-far-we-still-have-to-go.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geena Davis Institute on Media 2008 Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/geena-davis-institute-on-media-2008-conference.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/geena-davis-institute-on-media-2008-conference.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[geena davis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girls and movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girls and TV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media and gender]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexual objectification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexualization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women in movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women on TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/geena-davis-institute-on-media-2008-conference.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we see on TV becomes normalized. This is troubling when TV is full of violence, sex, violent sex, alcohol (most common beverage seen on TV), etc. Men are seen on TV more than women, and sexualized women are seen more than sexualized men.
The Geena Davis Institute on Media held a conference recently that discussed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/5058141.jpg" title="5058141.jpg"><img src="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/5058141.jpg" alt="5058141.jpg" align="left" hspace="10" /></a>What we see on TV becomes normalized. This is troubling when TV is full of violence, sex, violent sex, alcohol (most common beverage seen on TV), etc. Men are seen on TV more than women, and sexualized women are seen more than sexualized men.</p>
<p>The Geena Davis Institute on Media held a conference recently that discussed the potrayal of women on TV and in movies. They found all sorts of frustrating things:</p>
<ul>
<li>the ratio of men:women on screen is 1:3 (apparently up from 1:5 twenty years ago)</li>
<li>females are over 5 times more likely than males to be shown in sexually revealing clothing (about 4 times more likely in TV and movies aimed at children)</li>
<li>in animated material for children, females are far more likely to have unrealistic (and hypersexualized) body shapes - 22.7% vs. 1.2%</li>
</ul>
<p>Lynn Ziegler has a great article about the conference on truthout.org, <a href="http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/040208WA.shtml">On-Screen Sex Ratios Add Up to One Big Minus</a>.</p>
<p>Reuters also offers an <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS257939+07-Feb-2008+PRN20080207">overview of statistical findings</a> from the conference.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing Geena Davis is the figure head for this work - doesn&#8217;t she look great?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/geena-davis-institute-on-media-2008-conference.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Have All the Strong Women Gone?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/where-have-all-the-strong-women-gone.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/where-have-all-the-strong-women-gone.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aaron sorkin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ariana huffington]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bette davis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cameron diaz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[demi moore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[desperate housewives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[g.i. jane]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hillary clinton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[johann hari]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[julia roberts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[moulin rouge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nicole kidman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriarchy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[thelma and louise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truthout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/where-have-all-the-strong-women-gone.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t understand how one article can leave me feeling such delight and such anger simultaneously! Johann Hari&#8217;s &#8220;Where Have All the Stong Women Gone?&#8221; is a searing and straightforward critique of patriarchy&#8217;s destructive and completely unfair expectations of women.
Hari reminisces about Bette Davis&#8217; bad-ass characters on-screen, and her boldness off-screen. I&#8217;ve never seen a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how one article can leave me feeling such delight and such anger simultaneously! Johann Hari&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/032708WA.shtml" target="_blank">Where Have All the Stong Women Gone?</a>&#8221; is a searing and straightforward critique of patriarchy&#8217;s destructive and completely unfair expectations of women.</p>
<p>Hari reminisces about Bette Davis&#8217; bad-ass characters on-screen, and her boldness off-screen. I&#8217;ve never seen a Bette Davis movie, but I&#8217;m going to rent one this weekend. But, Hari wonders, &#8220;<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Who are our female icons now? Nicole Kidman, whose career is epitomized by her role in &#8216;Moulin Rouge&#8217;, where she plays a limp, passive prostitute, waiting to be saved. Julia Roberts, whose only iconic role is as a screwed-up prostitute, waiting to be saved. The women of &#8216;Desperate Housewives&#8217; - chaotic ditzes, who are either jobless, or have jobs where they merely spread chaos. The women of &#8216;Sex and the City&#8217;, who are obsessed with shoes and - in the end - have to compromise their careers for men.</font></font> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/where-have-all-the-strong-women-gone.html#more-23" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/04/where-have-all-the-strong-women-gone.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism Keeps My Marriage Together</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/feminism-keeps-my-marriage-together.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/feminism-keeps-my-marriage-together.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[christie church]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heterosexual]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[intimacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriarchy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[straight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[weddings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/feminism-keeps-my-marriage-together.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christie Church&#8217;s article &#8220;Feminism Keeps My Marriage Together&#8221; is conversational and honest. I think this is a perfect example of a story being both personal and relevant. She shares particularities that make this her story, but has enough self-awareness to make her own story more widely relevant. I also appreciate that she names the privilege [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><a href="http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/032608WA.shtml" target="_blank">Christie Church&#8217;s article &#8220;Feminism Keeps My Marriage Together&#8221;</a> is conversational and honest. I think this is a perfect example of a story being both personal and relevant. She shares particularities that make this <em>her</em> story, but has enough self-awareness to make her own story more widely relevant. I also appreciate that she names the privilege she and her husband have to be legally married. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The article points to some important concepts for anyone attempting to work, act, love or create with another gender. My favorite quote: <strong>&#8220;Intimacy just isn&#8217;t possible under patriarchy.&#8221;</strong></font></font></p>
<p>This approach to patriarchy is wonderfully simple and inviting - we all want intimacy, and we want it across gender lines, so let&#8217;s take patriarchy on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/feminism-keeps-my-marriage-together.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR: Catwoman: Feminine Power, on the Prowl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/npr-catwoman-feminine-power-on-the-prowl.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/npr-catwoman-feminine-power-on-the-prowl.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lisa</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[catwoman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comic book]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminazi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hero]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[icon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[symbol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/npr-catwoman-feminine-power-on-the-prowl.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR&#8217;s Allison Keyes discusses Catwoman&#8217;s appeal, contending that she is a symbol of feminine power. She interviews women who portrayed Catwoman, co-stars, and a writer, and describes Catwoman incarnations over the years.
Catwoman&#8217;s &#8220;feminine power&#8221; includes her independence, ruthlessness, but always (and often first and foremost) her sex appeal. The fact that a story can claim [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/catwoman_200p.jpg" alt="catwoman_200p.jpg" align="left" hspace="10" /><img src="http://www.thefeministreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/logo_npr_125.gif" alt="logo_npr_125.gif" align="right" hspace="10" /><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88203149" target="_blank">NPR&#8217;s Allison Keyes discusses Catwoman&#8217;s appeal</a>, contending that she is a <strong>symbol of feminine power</strong>. She interviews women who portrayed Catwoman, co-stars, and a writer, and describes Catwoman incarnations over the years.</p>
<p>Catwoman&#8217;s &#8220;feminine power&#8221; includes her independence, ruthlessness, but always (and often first and foremost) her sex appeal. The fact that a story can claim to discuss <em>empowerment of women</em> and not raise a single concern about this focus on sex appeal is disconcerting.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/npr-catwoman-feminine-power-on-the-prowl.html#more-18" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeministreview.com/2008/03/npr-catwoman-feminine-power-on-the-prowl.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
